Create an account to see the rest. Create an account to see the owner, portfolio, contacts, distress and comps for this building. The public facts below come from NYC Open Data.
Sign in
By using BlockLot you agree to the Terms of Service — in particular § 8, which prohibits automated collection. See also the Privacy Policy; if this page shows information about you or your property, see corrections and removal.
Property dossier
not scored yet
pulled ••/••/••••
Location
condominium's lot
This unit has no point of its own; the pin marks its
building.
Lot lines: NYC Department of Finance tax
map — the lot containing this property's
point. The rest of the block is drawn
faintly.
Open in Google Maps
· Street View
Future View and Building Watch for this block
Where this block is heading — new construction nearby, the sales and financing pattern, and our confidence in the reading — and an alert the day anything on this building's record changes.
Owner's portfoliono other current holdings listed
••
buildings
across ••
entities ·
•• units · •• assessed
| Address | Held by | Class | Units | Assessed | Purchased |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-45 44 DRIVE Apt 1G this property | ••••••••••• | 1 | $55,157 | — |
•• further building(s)
match
this owner's name but not their mailing address — deliberately not
listed.
On this database one common name maps to 159 buildings across 476 different mailing
addresses (dozens of unrelated people), while a genuine operator's 158 concentrate on
5. A name alone is a lead to check, not a holding to report.
One connected owner group.
Every building below is reached from the same group of
1 owner key, so every property in it shows this same list — whichever page you open.Shared mailing addresses and DOB/HPD filing links are evidence,
not grouping — see Connected buildings below.
Connected buildings
Buildings connected to this owner through a shared registered office, an HPD registration or a shared deed mailing address are listed for signed-in readers.
What this cannot see 3
Staten Island. ACRIS is the City Register's system and covers New York, Bronx, Kings and Queens counties only — Richmond County records are held by the county clerk. 144,675 buildings against 389 recorded sales.
Mortgages. A borrower's address would be the most current evidence available and none of it is here: 4,213,064 mortgage documents carry no party records, so no connection shown rests on one.
Unlinked condo lots. 5,141 condo unit lots have no identifiable parent building — they sit on blocks holding several condominiums, or none this data can tell apart — so a connection through one of them cannot be made at all.
Mortgages. A borrower's address would be the most current evidence available and none of it is here: 4,213,064 mortgage documents carry no party records, so no connection shown rests on one.
Unlinked condo lots. 5,141 condo unit lots have no identifiable parent building — they sit on blocks holding several condominiums, or none this data can tell apart — so a connection through one of them cannot be made at all.
Comparable sales ••••••••••• · class ••••••••••• · last •• months
••••••••••• · •• months
· 4 sales — the strongest peer set available
••
implied value — no priced prior deed to compare against
Median $/sq ft
$0
Median $/unit
••
| Sold | Address | Class | Units | Price | $/unit | $/sq ft |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ••/••/•••• | 21-45 44 DRIVE Apt 1D | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 21-45 44 DRIVE Apt PU05 | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 21-45 44 DRIVE Apt 6E | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 21-45 44 DRIVE Apt 1J | 1 | •• | •• | $•• |
An implied value, not an appraisal.
Basis: •••••••••••.
It knows nothing about condition, renovation, floor, light or lease status, and DOF
building class is a coarse peer definition —
No block-level peer set was large enough, so this widens to the
census tract — a weaker comparison that can cross into a different building era.
Deliberately a broad comparison for now; unit mix, floor and condition are a later
refinement. Use it to answer "is this owner sitting on more than they think", not to
price a deal.
⚠️ Debugging view — two sources, not one answer. The comps above are
ACRIS. Below, the same peer set counted from DOF Annualized Sales. This
is here so the two can be compared while it is decided which one the comps should
read; it is temporary and it is not part of the valuation.
| Source | Sales | Median price | Low | High | Median $/unit | Median $/sq ft |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRIS multi-lot deeds excluded outright |
4 | •• | •• | •• | •• | $•• |
| DOF · filtered rows sharing a date+price with another lot removed |
•• | — | — | — | — | — |
| DOF · raw exactly as DOF publishes it |
•• | — | — | — | — | — |
Same geography and same window as the ACRIS comps above
(•••••••••••, ••
months), so the only things that differ between these rows are the
source and the package rule.
•• of •• DOF rows here
share a date and a price with another lot and are dropped from the filtered row.
The filter is an inference, and DOF cannot confirm it.
DOF publishes no deed id, no CRFN, no instrument identifier of any kind, so
there is no exact way to tell a package deal from two unrelated sales that happened to
close at the same price on the same day. This drops both. It also only sees packages
whose other lots are inside this peer set — one spanning several blocks is
invisible here. Citywide it is not a small effect: 189,389 of 582,125 priced DOF
rows (32.5%) share a date and price with another lot.
Owner
- Roll owner
- •••••••••••
- Last sold
-
••/••/••••
No price stated on the deed
- Mailing
- •••••••••••
- Occupancy
- Owner-occupied address-normalised
- Deed parties
- Deed parties5
Registered at this property••
•••••••••••
No unit given —
3
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••/••/•••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••/••/•••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••/••/•••• |
Filed from a unit —
4
resident filings, not the owner
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• |
Companies whose NY DOS registered address is this building. This is a fact
about the address, not about the owner — in a multi-unit property these are
tenants and residents filing from home, and the owner may be none of them.
Entities naming an apartment are listed apart for that reason.
Registered at the owner's address••
None
Co-registration is common control, not ownership. Sharing a suite with the
owner LLC is strong evidence the same people run both, and is not proof — a
small accountant registers unrelated clients from one storefront and stays
well under the 50-entity agent-address threshold. Sharing only the building is
weaker still and is listed apart. Verify on the deed before acting on it.
Value & tax
- ••
- $55,157
- $••,•••
- Annual property tax
- ••
class 2–4 rate provisional
Taxable value × the class tax rate, before abatements and credits such as STAR — an estimate, not the bill.
- Taxable
- ••
- History
- Assessment history12
- Exemptions
- Exemptions14
Contacts
- Owner contact
- —
- All contacts
- All contacts12
- Boiler-registry phone
- — not held
Lot & building as recorded on the tax roll (PLUTO)
- Lot area
- held by the condominium's base lot not a unit-level figure
- Building area
- 526 sf
- Building dimensions
- — not recorded
- Floors
- 7.0
- Year built
- 2010
- 1 total · residential count not recorded
- Condominium
- yes unit lot 1007
- — not recorded
Zoning & use what the lot is allowed to be
- M14R8A
- —
- FAR
- held by the condominium's base lot not a unit-level figure
Sales history every recorded sale of this building, newest first — all lots of the condominium
| Date | Price |
|---|---|
| 2026-08-05 | •• |
| 2026-08-03 | •• |
| 2026-07-10 | •• |
| 2026-05-29 | •• |
| 2026-05-01 | •• |
| 2025-12-26 | •• |
| 2025-07-30 | •• |
| 2025-02-05 | •• |
| 2025-01-27 | •• |
| 2025-01-16 | •• |
Show all sales••
| Date | Price |
|---|---|
| 2025-01-10 | •• |
| 2024-10-23 | •• |
| 2024-10-22 | •• |
| 2024-08-18 | •• |
| 2024-06-25 | •• |
| 2024-06-10 | •• |
| 2023-12-23 | •• |
| 2023-08-31 | •• |
| 2023-04-14 | •• |
| 2023-02-27 | •• |
| 2022-06-22 | •• |
| 2022-05-13 | •• |
| 2022-04-21 | •• |
| 2021-06-04 | •• |
| 2021-05-19 | •• |
| 2021-05-03 | •• |
| 2021-04-09 | •• |
| 2020-12-18 | •• |
| 2020-11-04 | •• |
| 2020-09-15 | •• |
| 2020-05-28 | •• |
| 2020-01-09 | •• |
| 2020-01-09 | •• |
| 2019-11-25 | •• |
| 2019-11-20 | •• |
| 2019-06-12 | •• |
| 2019-01-03 | •• |
| 2018-12-27 | •• |
| 2018-12-27 | •• |
| 2018-08-29 | •• |
| 2018-07-24 | •• |
| 2018-06-28 | •• |
| 2018-05-31 | •• |
| 2018-04-25 | •• |
| 2018-04-16 | •• |
| 2018-01-18 | •• |
| 2017-12-14 | •• |
| 2017-10-17 | •• |
| 2017-10-13 | •• |
| 2017-10-13 | •• |
| 2017-07-12 | •• |
| 2017-07-12 | •• |
| 2017-05-04 | •• |
| 2017-05-04 | •• |
| 2017-04-18 | •• |
| 2016-12-28 | •• |
| 2016-12-23 | •• |
| 2016-12-23 | •• |
| 2016-12-23 | •• |
| 2016-12-08 | •• |
| 2016-11-16 | •• |
| 2016-11-16 | •• |
| 2016-08-15 | •• |
| 2016-06-08 | •• |
| 2016-06-08 | •• |
| 2016-04-01 | •• |
| 2016-03-15 | •• |
| 2016-03-15 | •• |
| 2016-03-15 | •• |
| 2016-03-10 | •• |
| 2016-03-10 | •• |
| 2016-01-05 | •• |
| 2015-10-30 | •• |
| 2015-01-15 | •• |
| 2014-12-15 | •• |
| 2014-09-05 | •• |
| 2014-08-27 | •• |
| 2014-07-28 | •• |
| 2014-05-02 | •• |
| 2013-09-06 | •• |
| 2013-05-17 | •• |
| 2013-05-17 | •• |
| 2013-03-18 | •• |
| 2012-12-26 | •• |
| 2012-12-21 | •• |
| 2012-12-17 | •• |
| 2012-12-12 | •• |
| 2012-11-21 | •• |
| 2012-11-08 | •• |
| 2012-10-26 | •• |
| 2012-10-25 | •• |
| 2012-10-17 | •• |
| 2012-10-16 | •• |
| 2012-10-16 | •• |
| 2012-10-05 | •• |
| 2012-10-04 | •• |
| 2012-10-01 | •• |
| 2012-09-28 | •• |
| 2012-09-27 | •• |
| 2012-09-27 | •• |
| 2012-09-25 | •• |
| 2012-09-20 | •• |
| 2012-09-19 | •• |
| 2012-09-19 | •• |
| 2012-09-14 | •• |
| 2012-09-13 | •• |
| 2012-09-10 | •• |
| 2012-09-07 | •• |
| 2012-09-07 | •• |
| 2012-08-30 | •• |
| 2012-08-30 | •• |
| 2012-08-23 | •• |
| 2012-08-23 | •• |
| 2012-08-20 | •• |
| 2012-08-10 | •• |
| 2012-08-02 | •• |
| 2012-07-30 | •• |
| 2012-07-27 | •• |
| 2012-07-23 | •• |
| 2012-07-20 | •• |
| 2012-07-18 | •• |
| 2012-07-10 | •• |
| 2012-07-09 | •• |
| 2012-07-03 | •• |
| 2012-06-29 | •• |
| 2012-06-28 | •• |
| 2012-06-27 | •• |
| 2012-06-27 | •• |
| 2012-06-22 | •• |
| 2012-06-20 | •• |
| 2012-06-20 | •• |
| 2012-06-19 | •• |
| 2012-06-18 | •• |
| 2012-06-15 | •• |
| 2012-06-14 | •• |
| 2012-06-07 | •• |
| 2012-05-31 | •• |
| 2012-05-25 | •• |
| 2012-05-25 | •• |
| 2012-05-14 | •• |
| 2012-05-14 | •• |
| 2012-05-03 | •• |
| 2012-05-02 | •• |
| 2012-04-26 | •• |
| 2012-04-17 | •• |
| 2012-04-13 | •• |
| 2012-04-12 | •• |
| 2012-04-10 | •• |
| 2012-03-30 | •• |
| 2012-03-30 | •• |
| 2012-03-14 | •• |
| 2012-03-05 | •• |
| 2012-03-01 | •• |
| 2012-02-16 | •• |
| 2012-02-07 | •• |
| 2012-01-24 | •• |
| 2012-01-11 | •• |
| 2012-01-09 | •• |
| 2011-12-02 | •• |
| 2011-11-21 | •• |
| 2011-11-17 | •• |
| 2011-10-28 | •• |
| 2011-10-18 | •• |
| 2011-10-13 | •• |
On this block Queens Block 438 · Long Island City-Hunters Point
- Storefronts
- 10
- 6 filed by owners (LL157, 2024) · 4 from business records
- Storefronts vacant
- 33.3%
- of the 6 filed
- Long Island City-Hunters Point 7.1% · Queens 6.5%
- Named storefront businesses
- 8
- Anchors (> 5 locations)
- 1
- Sales, last 24 months
- ••
- New-building, major-alteration & demolition permits, 12 months
- 0
- Lots in a distress band
- ••
- moderate or worse
- Unused buildable floor area
- 363,767 sq ft
- max FAR × lot area − built; rough
- Lots held by the largest owner
- 2
- its owner group, as the property page groups owners
This side (44 Drive, 21 Street → 23 Street): 8 storefronts, 5 vacant · Across the street: 11 storefronts, 0 vacant
Compliance & distress signals open complaints, violations, unpaid tickets and charges on this lot
Nothing open or owed on record: no open DOB or HPD complaints, active DOB safety violations, unpaid OATH tickets, overdue DOF charges, CONH listing or LL159 relocation charges.
From NYC Open Data: DOB complaints (open only), HPD complaints (2021 on),
DOB safety violations, FISP facade filings, boiler and elevator filings, OATH hearings
(unpaid only), DOF property charges (overdue, latest quarterly extract), HPD CONH list,
LL159 relocation charges, LL84 benchmarking. The LL33 grade is derived from the
ENERGY STAR score.
Federal tax liens IRS liens linked to this property's owners, from ACRIS
Sign in to see federal tax liens linked to this property.
A federal tax lien is the IRS's claim against a TAXPAYER for unpaid federal tax. It attaches to what that person or company owns; it is filed under their name and address, not against a building. "No release on record" describes the record: a lien paid recently may not show its release yet, and a lien with no release past the IRS's 10-year collection limit has normally expired. These are not the city's tax liens (unpaid property tax or water charges), which are a lien on the property itself and are listed under Tax liens in the records below.
Timeline ••••••••••• · ••••••••••• on one axis · ••–••
Click a type to hide it
Activity per quarter — the chart of how much happened when is drawn for signed-in readers.
••
•• events
••/••/••••
••••••••••• · •••••••••••
ו•
••
•• events
••/••/••••
•••••••••••
•••••••••••
••
••
•• events
••/••/••••
•••••••••••
•••••••••••
••
••/••/••••
••••••••••• · •••••••••••
ו•
••/••/••••
•••••••••••
•••••••••••
••
••
•• events
••/••/••••
•••••••••••
•••••••••••
••
••/••/••••
••••••••••• · •••••••••••
ו•
Records every count opens the rows behind it
Distress
Transactions & debt
Construction
Tax & value
Contacts
Area & flags
Occupants
Two badges. The blue one counts what is still live — open
violations, pending court cases, unrescinded vacate orders. The outlined one is the
total ever recorded, shown only when it differs. A landlord with sixteen closed
housing-court cases and none pending reads 0 on the first and 16 on the
second; showing only the first would hide the pattern entirely.