Create an account to see the rest. Create an account to see the owner, portfolio, contacts, distress and comps for this building. The public facts below come from NYC Open Data.
Sign in
By using BlockLot you agree to the Terms of Service — in particular § 8, which prohibits automated collection. See also the Privacy Policy; if this page shows information about you or your property, see corrections and removal.
Property dossier
✓ Distress •• / 100 · •••••••••••
pulled ••/••/••••
Why: •••••••••••
Location
condominium's lot
This unit has no point of its own; the pin marks its
building.
Lot lines: NYC Department of Finance tax
map — the lot containing this property's
point. The rest of the block is drawn
faintly.
Open in Google Maps
· Street View
Future View and Building Watch for this block
Where this block is heading — new construction nearby, the sales and financing pattern, and our confidence in the reading — and an alert the day anything on this building's record changes.
Owner's portfoliono other current holdings listed
••
buildings
across ••
entities ·
•• units · •• assessed
Registered office
•••••••••••
•••••••••••
| Address | Held by | Class | Units | Assessed | Purchased |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 325 LEXINGTON AVENUE Apt 3A this property | ••••••••••• | 1 | $69,534 | •• ••/••/•••• |
•• further building(s)
match
this owner's name but not their mailing address — deliberately not
listed.
On this database one common name maps to 159 buildings across 476 different mailing
addresses (dozens of unrelated people), while a genuine operator's 158 concentrate on
5. A name alone is a lead to check, not a holding to report.
One connected owner group.
Every building below is reached from the same group of
1 owner key, so every property in it shows this same list — whichever page you open.Shared mailing addresses and DOB/HPD filing links are evidence,
not grouping — see Connected buildings below.
Connected buildings
Buildings connected to this owner through a shared registered office, an HPD registration or a shared deed mailing address are listed for signed-in readers.
What this cannot see 3
Staten Island. ACRIS is the City Register's system and covers New York, Bronx, Kings and Queens counties only — Richmond County records are held by the county clerk. 144,675 buildings against 389 recorded sales.
Mortgages. A borrower's address would be the most current evidence available and none of it is here: 4,213,064 mortgage documents carry no party records, so no connection shown rests on one.
Unlinked condo lots. 5,141 condo unit lots have no identifiable parent building — they sit on blocks holding several condominiums, or none this data can tell apart — so a connection through one of them cannot be made at all.
Mortgages. A borrower's address would be the most current evidence available and none of it is here: 4,213,064 mortgage documents carry no party records, so no connection shown rests on one.
Unlinked condo lots. 5,141 condo unit lots have no identifiable parent building — they sit on blocks holding several condominiums, or none this data can tell apart — so a connection through one of them cannot be made at all.
Comparable sales ••••••••••• · class ••••••••••• · last •• months
••••••••••• · •• months
· 14 sales — the strongest peer set available
••
implied value ·
+••%
on the •• paid in
••/•
Median $/sq ft
$0
Median $/unit
••
| Sold | Address | Class | Units | Price | $/unit | $/sq ft |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ••/••/•••• | 325 LEXINGTON AVENUE Apt 14E | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 325 LEXINGTON AVENUE Apt 22C | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 325 LEXINGTON AVENUE Apt 26B | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 325 LEXINGTON AVENUE Apt 20B | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 325 LEXINGTON AVENUE Apt 27D | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 325 LEXINGTON AVENUE Apt RET | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 325 LEXINGTON AVENUE Apt 18D | 1 | •• | •• | $•• | |
| ••/••/•••• | 325 LEXINGTON AVENUE Apt 21B | 1 | •• | •• | $•• |
An implied value, not an appraisal.
Basis: •••••••••••.
It knows nothing about condition, renovation, floor, light or lease status, and DOF
building class is a coarse peer definition —
No block-level peer set was large enough, so this widens to the
census tract — a weaker comparison that can cross into a different building era.
Deliberately a broad comparison for now; unit mix, floor and condition are a later
refinement. Use it to answer "is this owner sitting on more than they think", not to
price a deal.
⚠️ Debugging view — two sources, not one answer. The comps above are
ACRIS. Below, the same peer set counted from DOF Annualized Sales. This
is here so the two can be compared while it is decided which one the comps should
read; it is temporary and it is not part of the valuation.
| Source | Sales | Median price | Low | High | Median $/unit | Median $/sq ft |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRIS multi-lot deeds excluded outright |
14 | •• | •• | •• | •• | $•• |
| DOF · filtered rows sharing a date+price with another lot removed |
•• | — | — | — | — | — |
| DOF · raw exactly as DOF publishes it |
•• | — | — | — | — | — |
Same geography and same window as the ACRIS comps above
(•••••••••••, ••
months), so the only things that differ between these rows are the
source and the package rule.
•• of •• DOF rows here
share a date and a price with another lot and are dropped from the filtered row.
The filter is an inference, and DOF cannot confirm it.
DOF publishes no deed id, no CRFN, no instrument identifier of any kind, so
there is no exact way to tell a package deal from two unrelated sales that happened to
close at the same price on the same day. This drops both. It also only sees packages
whose other lots are inside this peer set — one spanning several blocks is
invisible here. Citywide it is not a small effect: 189,389 of 582,125 priced DOF
rows (32.5%) share a date and price with another lot.
Owner
- Roll owner
- •••••••••••
- Last sold
- ••/••/•••• · ••
- Mailing
- •••••••••••
- Occupancy
- Absentee address-normalised
- Deed parties
- Deed parties2
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | DOS-matched |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | DOS-matched |
Registered at this property••
•••••••••••
Named process agents — natural persons
•••••••••••
via •••••••••••
No unit given —
5
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••/••/•••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••/••/•••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••/••/•••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••/••/•••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••/••/•••• |
Filed from a unit —
5
resident filings, not the owner
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• |
| ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• | ••••••••••• |
Companies whose NY DOS registered address is this building. This is a fact
about the address, not about the owner — in a multi-unit property these are
tenants and residents filing from home, and the owner may be none of them.
Entities naming an apartment are listed apart for that reason.
Registered at the owner's address••
•••••••••••
Same suite —
1
| ••••••••••• this owner | ••••••••••• | ••/••/•••• |
Co-registration is common control, not ownership. Sharing a suite with the
owner LLC is strong evidence the same people run both, and is not proof — a
small accountant registers unrelated clients from one storefront and stays
well under the 50-entity agent-address threshold. Sharing only the building is
weaker still and is listed apart. Verify on the deed before acting on it.
Value & tax
- ••
- $69,534
- $••,•••
- Annual property tax
- ••
class 2–4 rate provisional
Taxable value × the class tax rate, before abatements and credits such as STAR — an estimate, not the bill.
- Taxable
- ••
- History
- Assessment history9
- Exemptions
- Exemptions6
Contacts
- Owner contact
- —
- All contacts
- All contacts18
- Boiler-registry phone
- — not held
Lot & building as recorded on the tax roll (PLUTO)
- Lot area
- held by the condominium's base lot not a unit-level figure
- Building area
- 496 sf
- Building dimensions
- 47.0 × 63.0 ft
- Floors
- 33.0
- Year built
- 2013
- 1 total · residential count not recorded
- Condominium
- yes unit lot 2002
- — not recorded
Zoning & use what the lot is allowed to be
- —
- FAR
- held by the condominium's base lot not a unit-level figure
Sales history every recorded sale of this building, newest first — all lots of the condominium
| Date | Price |
|---|---|
| 2026-06-11 | •• |
| 2026-06-11 | •• |
| 2026-05-01 | •• |
| 2026-04-16 | •• |
| 2026-04-16 | •• |
| 2026-01-15 | •• |
| 2025-12-18 | •• |
| 2025-10-09 | •• |
| 2025-06-09 | •• |
| 2025-05-07 | •• |
Show all sales••
| Date | Price |
|---|---|
| 2025-03-19 | •• |
| 2025-02-28 | •• |
| 2025-01-03 | •• |
| 2024-12-26 | •• |
| 2024-11-14 | •• |
| 2024-10-22 | •• |
| 2024-10-02 | •• |
| 2024-04-15 | •• |
| 2024-03-25 | •• |
| 2024-02-09 | •• |
| 2023-10-20 | •• |
| 2023-10-19 | •• |
| 2023-05-11 | •• |
| 2022-12-09 | •• |
| 2022-09-19 | •• |
| 2022-07-01 | •• |
| 2022-05-19 | •• |
| 2022-03-07 | •• |
| 2022-01-14 | •• |
| 2022-01-07 | •• |
| 2021-11-11 | •• |
| 2021-10-15 | •• |
| 2021-10-01 | •• |
| 2021-09-17 | •• |
| 2021-08-06 | •• |
| 2021-08-03 | •• |
| 2021-07-29 | •• |
| 2021-04-30 | •• |
| 2021-02-10 | •• |
| 2020-06-05 | •• |
| 2019-10-28 | •• |
| 2019-09-05 | •• |
| 2019-07-24 | •• |
| 2019-06-27 | •• |
| 2019-01-28 | •• |
| 2018-12-11 | •• |
| 2018-11-09 | •• |
| 2018-08-24 | •• |
| 2018-08-23 | •• |
| 2018-01-24 | •• |
| 2017-07-21 | •• |
| 2017-05-26 | •• |
| 2017-02-23 | •• |
| 2017-02-08 | •• |
| 2017-01-20 | •• |
| 2016-07-12 | •• |
| 2016-07-06 | •• |
| 2016-06-30 | •• |
| 2016-06-22 | •• |
| 2016-06-20 | •• |
| 2016-06-17 | •• |
| 2016-04-29 | •• |
| 2016-04-07 | •• |
| 2016-04-01 | •• |
| 2016-03-15 | •• |
| 2016-03-15 | •• |
| 2016-03-14 | •• |
| 2016-01-19 | •• |
| 2016-01-14 | •• |
| 2015-12-16 | •• |
| 2015-12-09 | •• |
| 2015-11-16 | •• |
| 2015-11-16 | •• |
| 2015-11-12 | •• |
| 2015-11-09 | •• |
| 2015-11-02 | •• |
| 2015-10-20 | •• |
| 2015-10-16 | •• |
| 2015-10-15 | •• |
| 2015-09-30 | •• |
| 2015-09-28 | •• |
| 2015-09-17 | •• |
| 2015-08-31 | •• |
| 2015-08-11 | •• |
| 2015-08-10 | •• |
| 2015-08-07 | •• |
| 2015-08-04 | •• |
| 2015-07-31 | •• |
| 2015-07-28 | •• |
| 2015-07-27 | •• |
| 2015-07-24 | •• |
| 2015-07-23 | •• |
| 2015-07-10 | •• |
| 2015-07-08 | •• |
| 2015-07-07 | •• |
| 2015-07-01 | •• |
| 2015-06-29 | •• |
| 2015-06-29 | •• |
| 2015-06-29 | •• |
| 2015-06-17 | •• |
| 2015-06-16 | •• |
| 2015-06-15 | •• |
| 2015-06-09 | •• |
| 2015-06-08 | •• |
| 2015-06-05 | •• |
| 2015-06-04 | •• |
| 2015-06-04 | •• |
| 2015-06-03 | •• |
| 2015-06-02 | •• |
| 2015-05-28 | •• |
| 2015-05-22 | •• |
| 2015-05-20 | •• |
| 2015-05-20 | •• |
| 2015-05-18 | •• |
| 2015-05-13 | •• |
| 2015-05-12 | •• |
| 2015-05-06 | •• |
| 2015-05-01 | •• |
| 2015-04-30 | •• |
| 2015-04-29 | •• |
| 2015-04-28 | •• |
| 2015-04-24 | •• |
| 2015-04-22 | •• |
| 2015-04-15 | •• |
| 2015-04-14 | •• |
| 2015-04-08 | •• |
| 2015-04-07 | •• |
| 2015-04-02 | •• |
| 2015-03-25 | •• |
| 2015-03-23 | •• |
| 2015-03-19 | •• |
| 2015-03-17 | •• |
| 2015-03-17 | •• |
| 2015-03-13 | •• |
| 2015-03-12 | •• |
| 2015-03-10 | •• |
| 2015-03-05 | •• |
| 2015-02-27 | •• |
| 2015-02-24 | •• |
| 2015-02-23 | •• |
| 2015-02-20 | •• |
| 2015-02-19 | •• |
| 2015-02-19 | •• |
| 2015-02-18 | •• |
| 2015-02-18 | •• |
| 2015-02-17 | •• |
| 2015-02-17 | •• |
| 2015-02-13 | •• |
| 2015-02-13 | •• |
| 2015-02-12 | •• |
| 2015-02-12 | •• |
| 2015-02-12 | •• |
| 2015-02-12 | •• |
| 2015-02-11 | •• |
| 2015-02-11 | •• |
| 2015-02-11 | •• |
| 2015-02-11 | •• |
| 2015-02-10 | •• |
| 2015-02-10 | •• |
| 2015-02-10 | •• |
| 2015-02-10 | •• |
| 2015-02-10 | •• |
| 2015-02-09 | •• |
| 2015-02-09 | •• |
| 2015-02-06 | •• |
| 2015-02-06 | •• |
| 2015-02-06 | •• |
| 2015-02-05 | •• |
| 2015-02-05 | •• |
| 2015-02-05 | •• |
| 2015-02-04 | •• |
| 2015-02-04 | •• |
| 2015-02-03 | •• |
| 2015-02-03 | •• |
| 2015-02-03 | •• |
| 2015-02-03 | •• |
| 2015-02-02 | •• |
| 2015-02-02 | •• |
| 2015-02-02 | •• |
| 2015-02-02 | •• |
| 2014-05-12 | •• |
Commercial tenants Businesses licensed, registered or inspected at this address, per public records
1 storefronts · 0 vacant · 1 named — storefronts and vacancy as the owner filed them under Local Law 157 for 2024; named counts the storefront businesses listed below
This block: 23 storefronts, 1 vacant (2024) · Neighbourhood (Murray Hill-Kips Bay): 13.0% of storefronts vacant (2024) — LL157 filings; neighbourhood is DCP's 2020 tabulation area
Storefronts 1
Public records matched to this building by BlockLot. They may be outdated or matched to the wrong building, and a record naming a business here is not a statement that it is here now. Sources & licences.
Storefront history Ground- and second-floor storefronts the owner registered under Local Law 157, as filed with DOF
vacancy rate, 2019–2024
| Year | Storefronts | Vacant | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
As the owner filed it, for each reporting year. Counts move with what was registered (a storefront merged, split or left off the filing), so a change is not by itself an opening or a closing. "—": vacancy not reported that year. Source.
Lease expirations Reported lease end dates — not a statement that a lease ends
Storefront leases 1
Expiry dates as reported to DOF for 2023 under Local Law 157, future dates only. The filing names no tenant. DOF
| Reported expiry | Storefronts |
|---|---|
| 2031 | 1 |
A reported expiry is what was filed, not what will happen: leases are renewed, extended and ended early without any filing. Sources & licences.
On this block Manhattan Block 894 · City block 2 of 2 · Murray Hill-Kips Bay
- Storefronts
- 17
- 13 filed by owners (LL157, 2024) · 4 from business records
- Storefronts vacant
- 7.7%
- of the 13 filed
- Murray Hill-Kips Bay 13.0% · Manhattan 11.1%
- Named storefront businesses
- 9
- Anchors (> 5 locations)
- 0
- Sales, last 24 months
- ••
- Median $/sq ft, last 24 months
- ••
- single-lot priced deeds, condo units excluded
- New-building, major-alteration & demolition permits, 12 months
- 0
- Lots in a distress band
- ••
- moderate or worse
- Unused buildable floor area
- 174,478 sq ft
- max FAR × lot area − built; rough
- Lots held by the largest owner
- 3
- its owner group, as the property page groups owners
This side (Lexington Avenue, East 38 Street → East 39 Street): 4 storefronts, 0 vacant · Across the street: 2 storefronts, 1 vacant
Compliance & distress signals open complaints, violations, unpaid tickets and charges on this lot
- Overdue property charges
- •• across •• charges oldest due ••••••••••• · DOF extract ••/••/••••
From NYC Open Data: DOB complaints (open only), HPD complaints (2021 on),
DOB safety violations, FISP facade filings, boiler and elevator filings, OATH hearings
(unpaid only), DOF property charges (overdue, latest quarterly extract), HPD CONH list,
LL159 relocation charges, LL84 benchmarking. The LL33 grade is derived from the
ENERGY STAR score.
Federal tax liens IRS liens linked to this property's owners, from ACRIS
Sign in to see federal tax liens linked to this property.
A federal tax lien is the IRS's claim against a TAXPAYER for unpaid federal tax. It attaches to what that person or company owns; it is filed under their name and address, not against a building. "No release on record" describes the record: a lien paid recently may not show its release yet, and a lien with no release past the IRS's 10-year collection limit has normally expired. These are not the city's tax liens (unpaid property tax or water charges), which are a lien on the property itself and are listed under Tax liens in the records below.
Timeline ••••••••••• · ••••••••••• on one axis · ••–••
Click a type to hide it
Activity per quarter — the chart of how much happened when is drawn for signed-in readers.
••
•• events
••/••/••••
•••••••••••
•••••••••••
••
••/••/••••
•••••••••••
•••••••••••
••
Records every count opens the rows behind it
Distress
Transactions & debt
Construction
Tax & value
Contacts
Area & flags
Occupants
Two badges. The blue one counts what is still live — open
violations, pending court cases, unrescinded vacate orders. The outlined one is the
total ever recorded, shown only when it differs. A landlord with sixteen closed
housing-court cases and none pending reads 0 on the first and 16 on the
second; showing only the first would hide the pattern entirely.